Quick question for you.
Have you ever found yourself wondering&hellip;
Does tequila make sunfish more aggressive?
Does cocaine make Japanese quail more sexually active?
Or what about this:
Did Neil Armstrong say &ldquo;one small step for man&rdquo; or &ldquo;one small step for a man&rdquo;?
If yes&hellip;
You&rsquo;re apparently asking all the right questions. And you might have some money waiting for you from our dear old Uncle Sam.
On Monday, <a href="https://x.com/DOGE">the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) X account</a> shared some weird ways the government spends your tax dollars.
And, turns out, almost $2 million were used up to answer those exact three questions.
You&rsquo;ve no doubt heard of DOGE -- Elon and Vivek&rsquo;s project to cut government waste.
But you might not yet know the ins and outs.
So let&rsquo;s dig in with these three questions of our own:
What is DOGE, really?
Is it really going to work?
And the REAL question: Where in the WORLD did they get cocaine? (The answer might surprise you.)
All that and more in today&rsquo;s action-packed article.
<h2 class="subhead">What is DOGE, really?</h2>
Let&rsquo;s look at some facts, also shared by DOGE&rsquo;s X account:
- The Pentagon can&rsquo;t fully account for $824 Billion
- There was $236 Billion in improper payments in federal programs in 2023
- $200 Billion in pandemic relief went to fraud/abuse
- The U.S. failed to track $1 Billion in Ukraine Aid
Count it up.
That's over $1.2 TRILLION in questionable spending. And those are just the highlights we know about.
Enter DOGE.
It's designed to operate outside the traditional government structure&hellip;
While maintaining official status to work with the White House and Office of Management Budget.
The mission? Cut $2 trillion from the federal budget.
DOGE is essentially betting that sunlight isn't just the best disinfectant - it's also the best way to get retweets.
(Or whatever we're calling them since Elon killed the bird.)
<h2 class="subhead">Is it really going to work?</h2>
Well&hellip; thing is, history isn't encouraging.
In 1982, Reagan tried something similar with the Grace Commission.
Their mission? Find government waste using private sector expertise. They identified $424 billion in potential savings over three years.
Alas, most recommendations gathered dust. Turns out, pointing at waste is easy.
Actually cutting it? That's another story entirely.
BUT&hellip;
DOGE is different in one crucial way: social media exposure.
Their X account already has massive reach, and they're planning a "leaderboard" of the dumbest government spending.
Transparency plus public shame is a powerful motivator.
<h2 class="subhead">OK. What about the cocaine?</h2>
Right.
The question we&rsquo;ve all been waiting for.
According to the study, the cocaine was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Bethesda, MD.
As it happens&hellip;
That&rsquo;s not that far from our Maryland HQ.
Unfortunately, when I called to ask if they needed any volunteer quail-sitters, they hung up.
(And before you ask - no, they don't have a gift shop.)
Look, we could spend all day cracking jokes about government-funded cocaine studies and tequila-drinking fish.
(We laugh so as not to weep.)
But here's what matters: While DOGE works on exposing waste, our team has identified something far more interesting...
A company that's actually solving one of the government's biggest messes -- and could get a big boost from DOGE&rsquo;s mission.
And unlike studying drunk fish, this is work that absolutely must be done.
Dan Amoss and Jim Rickards recently briefed our Paradigm Mastermind Group members about this opportunity.
As Dan tells it, "This could be a multi-bagger."
And when Dan -- who never oversells an opportunity -- says something like that...
Well, we pay very close attention.
If you&rsquo;re a Paradigm Mastermind Group member, you should&rsquo;ve received the alert in your inbox. 
As usual, we&rsquo;re on the hunt for more ways to stay ahead of the puck. (But this latest one&rsquo;s a biggie.)

alc-hero-img-11-20-24

We&rsquo;re living in an epic period of change, danger, and opportunity. The economy is blowing up in our faces. The Fed is printing trillions of dollars. People are getting fired and replaced by computers. Every day, we&rsquo;re bombarded with fake news and fake data. Crypto is eating everything online. Every &ldquo;fix&rdquo; from the government makes things worse. Technology is moving too fast for anyone to keep up.
In short, the Old World has been demolished&hellip; the new world is just beginning. Alongside the greatest wealth shift in human history. We get it. People are desperate for answers and to cut through the noise. Everyone wants to become financially secure. Nobody knows who to trust. That&rsquo;s where we can help.
Altucher Confidential&nbsp;is your guide to surviving and thriving in the age of risk, chaos, and tremendous rewards. This is not a newsletter for the faint of heart. It&rsquo;s a guide West, to the new frontier. For those who are ready to hear, James Altucher and Chris Campbell provide an updated map of the new territory for generating wealth and freedom. Consider&nbsp;Altucher Confidential&nbsp;your daily guide to building, keeping, and investing your money and breaking free from the chains of rusted, old thinking.

AltucherConfidential

Altucher Confidential is your guide to surviving and thriving in the age of risk, chaos, and tremendous rewards. This is not a newsletter for the faint of heart.

Altucher Confidential

Cocaine Quail vs. DOGE

There's a reason I keep inviting Jim Rickards back to my podcast.
Not because we agree - sometimes we don't - but because he's usually spotted something I need to hear...
And also every time I talk to him, I feel like I should be paying tuition.
The guy&rsquo;s been everywhere, seen everything, and has the battle scars to prove it.
That&rsquo;s why I <a href="http://lnk.to/JRTS">had him on my podcast last week</a>.
Here's the thing about Jim - when he tells you a story about the economy, it's not from reading textbooks.
He was in the room.
Like when Long-Term Capital Management almost crashed the entire global financial system in '98.
Jim was their chief counsel.
He was the guy negotiating the bailout while the whole world held its breath.
So when he tells me we might be heading into a recession, I listen.&nbsp;
But, according to Jim, it's what comes after that matters.
For example, he drew this fascinating parallel to Reagan's presidency that got me thinking.
<h3>Remember 1981? </h3>
Reagan steps into office, inherits a mess, and boom - recession.
But then something happened.
From '83 to '86, the economy grew 16%. Not annually - total.
But still, that's more than anyone expected.
Jim thinks we might see the same movie play out with Trump's second term.
But here's where it gets interesting.
Everyone thinks the Fed controls everything through interest rates.
Jim says that's BS.
He told me this mind-blowing stat: during the longest economic expansion in U.S. history (2009-2019), interest rates were basically zero, but growth averaged a pathetic 2%.
"Low rates don't mean stimulus," he told me. "Hell, we had super low rates during the Great Depression."
So what really matters?
<h3>What Jim Really Thinks About Trump </h3>
Jim was at dinner in Washington recently at CPAC.
The host was going around the table pointing at people:
"There's our next Attorney General... there's our next Treasury Secretary..." 
These weren't just random picks - there's a whole shadow transition team already working.
You&rsquo;ll have to <a href="http://lnk.to/JRTS">listen to the podcast to hear what Jim REALLY thinks about Trump&rsquo;s picks</a>, but I&rsquo;ll say this:
It&rsquo;s going to be a total shake-up.
The next few months are going to be wild.
But for the economy&hellip;
The big question isn't whether the Fed will cut rates - according to Jim, that's theater.
The real question is whether banks will start lending again, whether businesses will start borrowing again.
As Jim puts it, "When neither side wants to dance, nobody's dancing."
By the way, we also talked about Jim's new book about AI and money.
The stories he can tell about what's really going on behind the scenes... that's the stuff you can't get anywhere else.
Don&rsquo;t miss this one. It&rsquo;s one of my most popular yet.
He also dropped a bombshell about Silicon Valley Bank that nobody's talking about. (It&rsquo;s SCARY.)
<a href="http://lnk.to/JRTS">Check out the full episode here</a>.
Stay tuned for part two where we dig into AI and the future of money.
By the way, if you like this kind of deep dive into what's really going on, subscribe to my podcast.

ALC-Issue-11-19-24(1)

My Chat With Jim Rickards

Writing from above Houston, TX&hellip; 
I&rsquo;m 3,621 feet in the air&hellip;
Speeding at 555mph&hellip;
After narrowly escaping tropical storm Sara&rsquo;s clutch last week&hellip;
AND ALL I CAN THINK ABOUT: a recent speech from Michael Saylor.
At Cantor Fitzgerald&rsquo;s recent event, Saylor laid out the clearest bull case for Bitcoin and crypto we&rsquo;ve seen.
His argument was simple but devastating: Bitcoin is inevitable.
Those who fail to grasp this are simply funding their own irrelevance.
Let&rsquo;s start with the facts, or as Saylor calls it, "the market screaming at you."
<h3>Entropy in the System </h3>
Over the last four years, Bitcoin has consistently crushed every major asset class.
Even the S&amp;P 500, bolstered by tech juggernauts, pales in comparison to Bitcoin's 60% annual return. Over 14 years, Bitcoin has delivered a 168% compounded return.
This isn&rsquo;t luck, says Saylor&mdash;it&rsquo;s physics.
He likens the global financial system to a decaying machine.
Everything&mdash;real estate, stocks, bonds&mdash;is corroding under the combined weight of inflation, taxes, politics, and plain old chaos.
We&rsquo;re burning $10 trillion a year just trying to stay afloat.
That&rsquo;s $10 trillion disappearing into entropy, a black hole that Bitcoin, with its &ldquo;digital thermodynamic properties&rdquo;, has the power to close.
Here&rsquo;s the thing, says Saylor:
Satoshi Nakamoto didn&rsquo;t just invent a way to send value without a middleman; he discovered a way to &ldquo;store value forever&rdquo;.
Bitcoin isn&rsquo;t a currency, Saylor argues&mdash;it&rsquo;s digital capital.
Imagine owning a building immune to hurricanes, taxes, tenants, or time. That&rsquo;s Bitcoin: the first "Thousand-Year Asset."
<h3>The Asymmetric Bet</h3>
The "use case"?
It's simple: you get to keep your money.
In a world where every other asset comes with counterparty risk&mdash;banks, governments, currencies, corporations&mdash;Bitcoin stands alone.
It&rsquo;s the solution every CEO, politician, and investor is desperately seeking.
They just don&rsquo;t know it yet.
Saylor&rsquo;s boldest claim is that Bitcoin will absorb &ldquo;half the world&rsquo;s capital&rdquo;&mdash;about $450 trillion.
Why? Because it&rsquo;s the only asset capable of preserving wealth without entropy.
It&rsquo;s not about flashy yachts or utility value; it&rsquo;s about survival. And the math doesn&rsquo;t lie. Even at today&rsquo;s prices, Bitcoin is woefully undervalued.
BUT
BTC is just one part of it.
<h3>The Crypto Renaissance</h3>
Traditional capital markets, Saylor says, are like buggy whips in the age of Teslas.
They&rsquo;re elitist, outdated, and painfully inefficient. It takes $40 million and four years to go public in the U.S., a process strangled by legal and bureaucratic red tape.
Meanwhile, crypto can do in four hours what takes Wall Street four years. And even Bitcoin maximalists like Saylor are beginning to see the value outside of BTC.
This is the core of the crypto renaissance&hellip;
Tokenized equity, bonds, real estate&mdash;everything becomes faster, smarter, and borderless.
The $500 trillion analog economy will migrate to the digital realm, unleashing unprecedented prosperity.
And blockchain as the foundational layer.
<h3>The Gamble of the Century</h3>
"If I&rsquo;m wrong,&rdquo; says Saylor, &ldquo;it costs nothing. If I&rsquo;m right, it solves everything."
With the recent elections heavily favoring crypto in the USA&hellip;
The U.S. has a once-in-a-century chance to lead the next era of finance.
But time is short, and crypto waits for no one.
For the rest of us, the message is clear: don&rsquo;t bet against inevitability.
You don&rsquo;t have to understand every nuance of crypto.
You just have to know this:
In the end, history won&rsquo;t remember those who played by the old rules.
It will remember those who saw the wave coming and rode it into the crypto renaissance.

The Crypto Epoch

Earlier this year, when Nvidia took up the mantel of the world&rsquo;s most valuable company, and hit the $3 trillion market cap, I called it.
This is the top, I said.
And it was. At least for a little while. I bought some puts and over the course of a few trades I parlayed $3,000 into roughly thirty grand.
Now, I&rsquo;ve had some time to reconsider my position.
The market has had some time to get used to the idea that maybe Nvidia really is a $3 trillion company.
And it will probably go further.
Bank of America has suggested the company could grow to a $5 trillion valuation.
While some analysts project the stock could reach $10 trillion by decade&rsquo;s end.
And why not? With artificial intelligence, we are witnessing the dawn of the most transformational technology ever to touch the globe. We&rsquo;re in an era of exponential change.
And over the last two years, we&rsquo;ve only gotten a taste of its power.
<h3>Trump to Repeal Biden&rsquo;s AI EO</h3>
So far, we&rsquo;ve also only seen what AI can do under a presidential administration more concerned with curtailing its power, than unlocking its full extent.
President Trump has promised that one of the first acts of his new administration will be to repeal Biden&rsquo;s executive order on artificial intelligence, #14110.
From its title, you can tell that where President Biden&rsquo;s priorities were:
&ldquo;Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.&rdquo;
And from the press release:
<blockquote cite="">
&ldquo;The Executive Order establishes new standards for AI safety and security, protects Americans&rsquo; privacy, advances equity and civil rights, stands up for consumers and workers, promotes innovation and competition, advances American leadership around the world, and more.&rdquo;
</blockquote>
Look, I&rsquo;m not saying that AI safety is bad. Elon Musk has suggested that unrestrained AI could wipe out humanity.
But critics make a compelling point.
They say if we don&rsquo;t retain our position as the dominant AI superpower, someone else (namely China) will get ahead of us &ndash; creating unforeseen consequences we can&rsquo;t even imagine.
It&rsquo;s similar to World War II, when the scientists behind the Manhattan Project believed they were in a race against time with Germany to develop the first atomic bomb.
We&rsquo;ve lived under the threat of these weapons even since. But there&rsquo;s peace in strength and mutually assured destruction &ndash; so long as the US retains its completive edge.
That&rsquo;s why the race to create AI 2.0, or artificial superintelligence, is paramount.
<h3>America&rsquo;s AI President?</h3>
I think this is actually one of the most exciting prospects of Trump&rsquo;s recent team-up with Elon Musk.
Musk understands the risks and rewards of the technology.
He knows we must create AI that&rsquo;s safe &ndash; but part of that safety is making sure our tech stays ahead of our enemy&rsquo;s.
I think that&rsquo;s why we&rsquo;re seeing AI defense contractors like Palantir Technologies take off after Trump&rsquo;s win.
It was recently admitted into the S&amp;P 500 and stands to be the index&rsquo;s top performer by year end. It&rsquo;s up nearly 300% YTD.
It reminds me of 2020, when Tesla earned its spot in the index, becoming that year&rsquo;s top performer.
I&rsquo;m extremely bullish on both stocks, and own positions in each.
Speaking of The Manhattan Project, we are looking to add a new company to the Altucher Investment Network model portfolio that is an emerging leader in an advanced version of nuclear power, in our next issue.
This comparison is probably careless on my part. Nuclear weapons and nuclear energy do not use the same technology. The mistaken assumption that they do is one of the reasons why nuclear energy was in limbo for the last few decades.
But we are quickly awakening to the fact nuclear energy is the only way we can power AI at scale. It requires too much electricity to power by conventional means.
New, advanced microreactors seem to be emerging as the preferred weapon of choice for powering these new innovations. Large scale reactors cost as much as $15 billion to build. These microreactors will be as cheap as $15 million.
Lots of exciting developments. With President Trump taking the helm, the AI bull market may be just getting started.

ALC-Issue-11-15(1)

Trump’s Manhattan Project

Today I want to tell you about one of the weirdest stocks I&rsquo;ve ever encountered.
And it&rsquo;s absolutely crushing it right now on as we prepare for Trump&rsquo;s return to the White House.
Last month, I shared three bizarre &ldquo;Trump Trades&rdquo; that I predicted would skyrocket on Trump&rsquo;s reelection.
This was at a private meeting in Baltimore that we held for James&rsquo; subscribers &ndash; some of you might have attended.
James challenged us speakers to come equipped with our weirdest stocks ideas, if we had them.
During my talk, I shared:
<ul>
<li>The emerging leader in CBD-enhanced beverages</li>
<li>An obscure microcap that owns the world&rsquo;s largest reserve of gold</li>
<li>And America&rsquo;s largest company by assets &ndash; which just happens to be a tiny small cap</li>
</ul>
These were, admittedly, some really really strange stock picks.
But they&rsquo;re doing well. They&rsquo;ve returned -16%, +34% and +151% since I gave my talk on October 1.
I&rsquo;ll highlight one today. It&rsquo;s the stock that&rsquo;s already up 151%. And I&rsquo;m talking about it now because it may still have an additional 1,000% upside.
<h3>The Government&rsquo;s Cash Cow</h3>
Full disclosure &ndash; I bought shares of this company about 6 years ago. It&rsquo;s sitting in some brokerage account that I&rsquo;ve completely forgotten about. Seriously, I don&rsquo;t know where this brokerage account is because my bank pawned off its brokerage wing and I don&rsquo;t know what happened to it. So I bought more a week ago.
Anyway.
If you had to guess what America&rsquo;s largest company was by total assets, what would you guess?
Hint &ndash; it&rsquo;s not listed on a major exchange.
And its total assets eclipse the top 10 publicly listed companies that are on a major exchange &ndash; combined.
AT&amp;T, SoftBank, Royal Dutch Shell, Microsoft, Verizon, Exxon Mobil, Alphabet, Apple, TotalEnergies SE, and Chevron.
Add all of them up, and their total assets are worth less than this one, obscure small cap.
It gets weirder.
This company is undervalued by &ndash; get this &ndash; about 96%.
And it has 10 times more money IN CASH than the total value of all of its shares.
I&rsquo;m talking about the Federal National Mortgage Association, otherwise known as &ldquo;Fannie Mae.&rdquo;
You probably remember the story. Fannie Mae was delisted from the NYSE when the government bailed them out along with Freddie Mac after the housing debacle in 2008.
Both companies have been under a conservatorship with the federal government ever since.
The deal was they had to pay everything back that the government lent them. Then, maybe one day, a conversation could be had about removing the shackles and letting the companies return private.
Fannie Mae alone received a $116 billion bailout.
Here&rsquo;s the thing. Fannie Mae paid all of its debts 10 years ago.
By 2015, it had paid the government $142 billion.
By 2019, they were up to $300 billion.
And I don&rsquo;t even know how much they&rsquo;ve paid since then.
My guess is they&rsquo;re up to $500 billion by now.
Which means the federal government has made a greater than 300% return on the mortgage giants since they were bailed out.
<h3>Back From the Dead?</h3>
Look, I don&rsquo;t feel any pity for Fannie and Freddie.
They destroyed the economy in 2008.
But there&rsquo;s an argument to be made that so long as they remain under the government&rsquo;s thumb, they can&rsquo;t fulfill their true duty of liquifying the secondary mortgage market, thereby making borrowing more accessible to prospective homeowners.
This has become a political issue now that mortgage rates are at 20-year highs. And homes are a LOT more expensive than they were 20 years ago.
There&rsquo;s also the argument to be made that the government&rsquo;s conservatorship was illegal in the first place, and amounts to the seizure of private assets &ndash; and that the profits accrued belong to shareholders, not the government.
(Yo Uncle Sam &ndash; where my money?)
Opponents, however, argue that letting the companies go private will increase the cost of mortgages. Under the conservatorship, Fannie can borrow money from the Treasury at lower rates &ndash; and has lower capital holding requirements &ndash; than banks. So Fannie would have to charge more in order to return to an equal footing with the banks they compete with.
Me? I don&rsquo;t have an opinion on the matter.
It&rsquo;s irrelevant either way.
Donald Trump has already issued his plan to privatize the companies again. It&rsquo;s an idea he floated in his first term, and the stock has been drifting higher for the last year and a half as investors awoke to the realization that Trump was probably going to win. And with a Republican-controlled Congress and Supreme Court, there&rsquo;s a good chance he&rsquo;ll get his way.
If the company goes private, it means Fannie will buy back all of the shares we own &ndash; at a potentially much higher multiple than they&rsquo;re trading now.
<h3>This Chart Makes Me LOL</h3>
It&rsquo;s a funny chart, isn&rsquo;t it?
You almost can&rsquo;t tell the stock is up over 500% since its low in 2022.
The stock still trades over the counter on the pink sheets. I bought shares through Interactive Brokers last week.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/7HXuppEQ0Ex96SfouK9UDC/dcb6cb25d477ba03d5498f3c0306b9e9/ALC-Issue-11-14_2_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
It&rsquo;s trading for around $3 per share.
Fannie&rsquo;s total portfolio value is about $4.3 trillion. Again, it&rsquo;s the largest company by assets. The company itself is worth about $90 billion.
The stock, however, has a market cap worth just over $3 billion.
So the stock is technically trading at a 96% discount.
The reason is &ndash; there has been no demand for the stock for the last 16 years because the company can&rsquo;t return profits to shareholders.
When everyone goes to sell, it creates market dislocations where companies can trade well below book value. This is a dramatic example, but there are quite a few companies like this. We own a few stocks trading below book value in Microcap Millionaire.
However, if the company goes private, there&rsquo;s an argument to be made we&rsquo;ll see up to a 1,000% return from these levels.
That&rsquo;s because Fannie Mae has $38 billion in cash and cash equivalents &ndash; and another $38 billion in unrestricted cash according to their most recent earnings statement.
That first $38 billion alone is enough to buy back all the shares at a 10x multiple to where they are now.
I&rsquo;m not saying Fannie will indefinitely buy them back at that price. But if enough investors buy the stock, it&rsquo;s likely Fannie will still be willing to pay any price they&rsquo;re able to in order to escape the conservatorship. 
This is a weird, risky play, because there&rsquo;s &hellip; no playbook for this. But if you like asymmetric bets, this one&rsquo;s up there.
#YOLO

ALC-Issue-11-14(1)

Weird Stock Skyrockets on Trump Win

Bitcoin has crossed $90,000.
Polymarket is now wagering an 81% chance it hits $100,000 by EOY.
Seriously? Just 81%?
At this pace, I think Bitcoin will hit $100,000 by Friday.
And we&rsquo;re going to party when it does.
I&rsquo;m debating between an 18 year old Macallan or a 21 year Hibiki. Don&rsquo;t know which way I&rsquo;ll go yet.
But while everyone is piling into Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies this week &ndash; I&rsquo;m paying more attention to the OTHER big trade right now.
I mentioned yesterday that this week, the entire crypto sector passed its $3 trillion market cap peak set in November 2021.
But there&rsquo;s another $3 trillion market that I predict will make many, many new millionaires in 2025.
Possibly more than the rest of the stock market combined.
It&rsquo;s a relatively tiny, niche corner of the stock market that tends to return the best gains in environments like the one we&rsquo;re in now.
And oddly enough &ndash; between crypto and these tiny stocks I&rsquo;m talking about &ndash; I have found a way that allows you to play the best of both worlds.
<h3>A World Without Risk? </h3>
Today the U.S. stock market is worth about $60 trillion.
The vast majority of it &ndash; more than $50 trillion &ndash; is invested in the S&amp;P 500.
And then a tiny portion of it &ndash; roughly 5%, or $3 trillion &ndash; is in the Russell 2000.
Otherwise known as the small cap stock market.
It contains the smallest 2000 stocks in the Russell 3000 &ndash; which serves as the main benchmark for the whole U.S. market.
Yesterday, <a href="https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-melt-up-begins">I shared three reasons why</a>&nbsp;the microcap stocks inside the Russell 2000 are the place to be as we enter a new year in America.
They are the Fed&rsquo;s rate cuts &hellip; the sheer size of the U.S. money supply &hellip; and the election aftershock (the fact that stocks usually go up after an election year).
All three of these reasons benefit microcaps more than large caps.
Large caps have dominated the last two years of the bull market. Now that we&rsquo;re in a risk-on environment, smaller stocks are the place to be because virtually all of the risk has been dissipated.
Recession? The Fed can cut rates to zero.
War? Hamas is already begging for mercy. Putin has made it clear he wants to make a deal with Trump regarding Ukraine. And Xi Jinping knows Trump is too crazy to mess with.
Higher taxes? Nope. Trump wants to cut Americans&rsquo; taxes and is willing to cut the corporate tax rate to 15% (from 21%) for companies that produce their goods domestically.
This benefits microcaps especially since smaller companies in the U.S. stock market tend to generate most of their sales domestically in the first place. It&rsquo;s the larger companies with more global operations that are quickly trying to reshore.
But what about tariffs? Sorry, not an issue. Only 15% of the goods and services consumed in the U.S. are imported. We also have a $800 billion trade deficit. Oh, and there was no increase in inflation because of tariffs in Trump&rsquo;s first term. I&rsquo;m sorry, but the whole argument that higher tariffs will cause inflation is complete bogus.
<h3>My Big Prediction</h3>
Look, there&rsquo;s obviously always some risk in the stock market.
But it&rsquo;s difficult to understate the number of bullish catalysts that have just come into play.
And it often takes months, if not years, for these policy shifts to work their way into the economy and stock market.
All of this leads me to a simple conclusion &ndash; 2025 might be just as big as the last two years of the bull market combined.
My actual prediction? The U.S. stock market will be worth $100 trillion by America&rsquo;s 250th birthday, July 4, 2026.
That&rsquo;s about a 66.6% return from where we are now.
Triple 6&rsquo;s? A little ominous. But making money is scary.
I know a lot of traders who are shaking in their boots right now.
The stock market is overstretched, they wail and complain.
And sure, small pullbacks will happen. We might even see one this week.
But between the Fed&rsquo;s rate cuts &hellip; Trump promising lower taxes &hellip; and the second, incoming wave of the AI boom&hellip;
I think the $100 trillion stock market is inevitable.
I haven&rsquo;t even touched on AI 2.0. But the biggest innovations in AI aren&rsquo;t happening in Nvidia anymore. They&rsquo;re happening in the software companies that are using Nvidia&rsquo;s chips to bring AI to life. <a href="https://pro.paradigm-press.info/m/2376451">And we own a lot of them in Microcap Millionaire,</a>And we own a lot of them in Microcap Millionaire, the microcap service I run with James Altucher.
But let me return to my main point.
If you&rsquo;re a stock investor, microcaps are the place to be now.
If the S&amp;P 500 hits 10,000, or 66.6%, we&rsquo;ll probably see the Russell 2000 reach 2-3x better gains, in line with similar microcap booms we&rsquo;ve seen in the past.
Just a few months ago, microcaps were trading at some of their steepest discounts relative to large caps in decades.
You&rsquo;d have to go all the way back to the bottom of the dotcom bust to see a better buying opportunity.
That&rsquo;s how brutal 2022 was for these microcaps.
When the Fed raised rates so quickly, microcaps got crushed and everyone forgot they exist.
Now, we have a chance to buy them before they&rsquo;re on everyone&rsquo;s radar.
I am still seeing some microcaps that are trading below value and some that are even trading below cash. We even own some of them in Microcap Millionaire.
Trading below value means a large investor could come in, buy the whole company, and liquidate it for an instant profit without the share price needing to go up at all.
Trading below cash means it&rsquo;s trading so FAR below book value, the company literally has more cash in the bank than the entire stock is worth.
It&rsquo;s this weird mispricing effect that really only occurs during moments like now when microcaps are really cheap.
I remember, in October 2020, I found this company called Moxian that specialized in helping small and mid-sized businesses grow their presence online. The stock was trading for $1 and hadn&rsquo;t really gone up yet &ndash; and this was months into the pandemic.
It didn&rsquo;t take much for me to realize that a company specializing in helping small companies grow their online presence during a pandemic when all these companies were losing foot traffic would probably be a big winner.
And it was. I cashed out in June 2021, eight months later for a 2,143% gain.
So I&rsquo;ve literally made 1,000%-level returns on these microcaps in the past.
And I&rsquo;ve noticed a bunch of microcaps that have gone up 1,000% in the last year.
Will we see more microcaps go up 1,000% in 2025? I think it&rsquo;s almost certain. But time will tell.
More microcap madness tomorrow.

The $100 Trillion Stock Market

No, I&rsquo;m not Chris Campbell.
I&rsquo;m his evil twin, Chris Cimorelli.
As I mentioned yesterday, Chris is out on vacation this week and asked me to tell you about the OTHER big opportunity as we prepare to enter 2025.
You can think of me as what Chris is for crypto under the Altucher Investment Network franchise, except for microcap stocks.
This week, the total market cap for all of crypto surpassed its previous high of $3 trillion set in November 2021.
It&rsquo;s an exciting moment for crypto. The entire sector is up about 250% since it bottomed out in December 2022.
And hitting new all-time-highs this early in the cycle means there&rsquo;s a whole lot of upside still left (if historical trends continue, crypto won&rsquo;t peak until next November 2025. Although there are arguments to be made it will go past that. A discussion for another time).
Here&rsquo;s the difference. Unlike crypto, the microcap bull market has only just started. 
And it&rsquo;s already starting to outperform the rest of the stock market.
That last time this happened was during the explosive bull run from March 2020 to November 2021.
During that run, microcaps led the way higher &ndash; outperforming even some of the top stocks in the Nasdaq technology index.
I&rsquo;m convinced 2025 is going to be a repeat of 2021. Let me give you my top three reasons why.
Reason #1&mdash;
<h3>The Fed Punch Bowl Is Back (And It Tastes Delicious)</h3>
For the first time in a long time, last week&rsquo;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting got almost zero press because apparently there was an election last week or something.
Last week, the Fed cut interest rates by another quarter basis point. In September, they cut by half a point &ndash; meaning interest rates are now down 0.75% from their peak just two months ago.
Oh, and there&rsquo;s still a greater than 50% chance we&rsquo;ll see another quarter point cut in December.
Historically, microcap stocks outperform when the Fed begins cutting rates.
That&rsquo;s because lower rates means businesses pay less money on any debt.
Smaller companies tend to fuel growth with debt because they don&rsquo;t have enough revenue.
And these companies typically get stuck with debt with variable (not fixed) interest rates. Banks won&rsquo;t lock them in to a fixed, reduced rate because smaller companies are riskier.
All this is to say &ndash; rate cut environments benefit smaller, less established companies than larger, more established ones.
Now, here&rsquo;s the caveat. In Microcap Millionaire, we&rsquo;re focusing on microcap stocks that have zero debt (or close to it).
But it doesn&rsquo;t really matter. In a bear market OR rising rate environment, even the high quality microcaps are guilty by association. It&rsquo;s a weird form of stock market prejudice that develops where small = bad.
Investors pile into the large caps because they&rsquo;re perceived as being safer.
Once the market switches back to a risk-on environment, investors panic because they forgot all about these incredible, high quality, tiny companies that can generate some of the biggest returns in the market.
So that&rsquo;s #1. The great thing about higher rates is, the Fed has plenty of ammunition to fight any sort of hiccup that pops up inside the economy.
Recession? Who cares? If things get bad enough, the Fed can always cut rates back to zero and the stock mania will resume.
<h3>Mo&rsquo; Money, Mo&rsquo; Mania</h3>
The second reason is a little more basic &ndash; the money supply is just as big as it was in 2020 and 2021 when the Fed printed a boatload of money to fight Covid.
Put another way, all the money that caused those insane stock gains to happen before is still out there.
The only reason the last bull market was cut short is because inflation started to spin out of control and the Fed was forced to raise rates.
Stocks hate higher rates because it puts a cap on their bottom line.
Now that the Fed is cutting rates, all that new money is back to doing its job &ndash; looking for the best places to grow.
Here&rsquo;s a graph of the money supply. As you can see, there was a slight dip in 2022 and it&rsquo;s been creeping back up over the last year. But we&rsquo;re talking about meager differences compared to the huge jump we in 2020 and 2021.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/5zHMeDcT6vtnJMy3CNicSF/384935bea35f4b29b9a6fb7c5a3401b6/ALC-Issue-11-12_2_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
More money equals more money looking for a place to live. When rates were on the rise, record levels of cash piled into money market funds where you could get a crisp, clean, risk-free 5% on your cash.
Now, money is gushing out of those same funds and rushing into the top opportunities in a risk-on environment &ndash; which is crypto and microcaps.
But the third reason trumps all of them.
<h3>Election Aftershock</h3>
Here&rsquo;s the thing. I don&rsquo;t think it really mattered too much who won the election.
Last Monday, I told our Microcap Millionaire subscribers that microcaps were going to take off after the election regardless of who wins.
That&rsquo;s because I was predicting a divided Congress in the off-chance Harris won. Which meant it would have been difficult for Harris to raise the corporate tax rate after Trump&rsquo;s cuts expire next year.
And stocks like maintaining the status quo.
Of course, that didn&rsquo;t happen. Republicans will officially control the White and both branches of Congress beginning in January.
But my same prediction played out either way &ndash; last Wednesday, microcaps outperformed the rest of the market by more than 2-to-1 (about 6% for the microcap index vs. 2.5% for the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq).
There&rsquo;s a bigger story at play here though.
There is typically a major &ldquo;aftershock&rdquo; that plays out the year after the U.S. presidential election.
That&rsquo;s because investors are hesitant to deploy new cash before an election. They want to know what policies will be in place next year before making new moves. 
Once the road becomes clear, massive amounts of money reallocate &ndash; and even more, new money comes in.
The same thing happened four years ago when Joe Biden won and carried both branches of Congress with him.
It didn&rsquo;t matter that he was the Democrat. Markets actually viewed Joe as a return to normalcy (at least in his first year).
So, stocks took off after the election.
I mentioned this yesterday, but this past week was personally my best week as an investor since the week after the November 2020 election.
This is not a coincidence. The same thing happened again back in 2016 &ndash; when Trump swept everything back then. Stocks took off and 2017 was a banner year.
And actually, the year after the 2012 election was a really killer year as well.
Investors brace for political chaos before the election. They lean in after.
And now that we know Trump&rsquo;s tax cuts will remain in place for the foreseeable future, microcaps are the place to be.
In the past week, we&rsquo;ve had three different stocks in the Microcap Millionaire model portfolio cross the 100% mark.
Based on the calculations I ran yesterday, we were outperforming the market by about 3-to-1 since we launched the service in July.
But it&rsquo;s still early. I&rsquo;m predicting we&rsquo;ll see some 300% &hellip; 500% &hellip; possibly even those rare 1,000% winners.
That&rsquo;s because things can get really, really nutty during these microcap manias. Because these stocks are so small, it doesn&rsquo;t take THAT much to send one of these stocks up 1,000%.
For instance, a $500 million stock can go to $5 billion and it&rsquo;s still technically a small cap.
It&rsquo;s worth noting that I&rsquo;m seeing big institutional players like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street take up sizeable positions in these companies.
Once the whales move in, it doesn&rsquo;t take a whole lot for these stocks to pop.

ALC-Issue-11-12(1)

The Melt-Up Begins

Chris Campbell is taking a much deserved break this week, mostly likely globetrotting to some faraway, exotic locale that we&rsquo;d both be jealous of. Or, idk, maybe Ohio.
Me? I couldn&rsquo;t imagine taking time off this week. I&rsquo;m making too much freaking money.
I don&rsquo;t know about you, but I&rsquo;m personally enjoying my best week since November 2020.
Still, I have a bit of a difficult task this week.
This week, it&rsquo;s my job to do my absolute darndest to get you excited about something other than crypto.
It&rsquo;s a tall order.
Bitcoin is ripping to one new high after the next.
Polymarket, the online betting platform that predicted Trump&rsquo;s historic win last week, is now saying there&rsquo;s a 50-50 chance Bitcoin hits $100,000 by the end of the year.
And while I&rsquo;m making an absolute fortune in crypto right now &ndash; and think it&rsquo;s still one of the best trades to make as we enter 2025&hellip;
I think investors who are trying to get filthy rich next year would be remiss if they ignored an even bigger opportunity unfolding inside of the regular ol&rsquo; stock market.
<h3>Stocks Are So 2024 Right? WRONG!</h3>
I&rsquo;ve been predicting for a few months that we were about to enter 2020 and 2021 territory again.
You know, that crazy period when stocks would literally double in price overnight.
I know, I know. Cryptos can do the same thing.
What you probably didn&rsquo;t know is that there are multiple stocks that have been making crypto-like returns for the last year now.
For example&hellip;
If you had to guess the best stock of the last year, what would you go with?
Chances are, you&rsquo;d pick one of the popular AI names&hellip;
Like Nvidia, which is up another 200% year-to-date&hellip;
Or Palantir Technologies, which is up even more on its recent inclusion into the S&amp;P 500.
Or perhaps MicroStrategy, the popular Bitcoin proxy that is up over 500% from a year ago.
Except, none of these stocks come anywhere close.
The best stock of the past year is up almost 6,000%. 
And what&rsquo;s even more shocking, it is still a tiny, miniature small cap stock you have probably never heard of.
<h3>It&rsquo;s Not the Size That Counts</h3>
Again, I would bet money that 99.99% of you have never heard of this stock.
It&rsquo;s call GeneDx. It was one of the biggest losers during the last bear market.
From February 2021 to November of last year, the stock quite literally dropped 99.99%.
No, that&rsquo;s not a typo.
Over the last year? It&rsquo;s up 5,883%.
That&rsquo;s no typo either.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3upIHJzV4uX8UkOP24q4Ny/bcd6b7a7da63e5086d5dff156f826e22/ALC-Issue-11-11_2_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
It&rsquo;s without a doubt the greatest comeback story in the history of the stock market.
GeneDx is beginning to emerge as a leader in the genomics space.
But before its epic turnaround, the company was burning through so much cash it was losing $90 million per quarter and operated at a (get this) negative 833% gross margin.
So it was basically spending $9 for every $1 it made in sales.
Today? The company just posted its first quarterly profit on $76.6 million in revenue.
The crazy part &ndash; the company is barely worth $2 billion today. So it&rsquo;s still a teeny, tiny small cap. Which means at its cheapest valuation, it was worth about $30 million.
Here&rsquo;s another one&hellip;
Have you heard of Sezzle? It&rsquo;s down 5% today. And it&rsquo;s still up almost 4,000% on the one year chart.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4pIm6oaNUSEi04oDSfy0yO/e17532a6fbe09b809f21d664cd128ac1/ALC-Issue-11-11_3_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
The damn thing is up 160% in the last month alone.
It&rsquo;s one of those &ldquo;buy now, pay later&rdquo; companies that gives you the option to pay everything now &hellip; or pay everything in 4 interest-free payments over six weeks.
How the heck does this company make money? Well, it makes money from retailers who use it as a payment option on their order forms. Sezzle charges the seller 6% per transaction. And of course, the company also makes money from late fees and the inevitable interest accrued from customers who don&rsquo;t pay everything back within 6 weeks.
And apparently, the company is making a ton of money. Third quarter revenue of $41 million was up 71% year-over-year. The company&rsquo;s gross margin is over 50%. And last quarter it facilitated over 450 million purchases.&nbsp;
<h3>Meltup = Microcap Madness</h3>
Sezzle was another one of these companies that was just a tiny microcap stock but a year ago.
Another one you might have heard of is NuScale Power, which has the only government-approved designed for a &ldquo;small modular reactor,&rdquo; or SMR &ndash; which is basically a smaller, more advanced nuclear reactor. It was a $500 million microcap just a year ago. It&rsquo;s worth over $5 billion today.
My point is, there are several stocks that have gone up 1,000% or more in the last year alone.
And I&rsquo;m predicting we&rsquo;ll see many more of these gains as we prepare to enter 2025.
You should know, however, that these types of gains are really only possible in the most misunderstood and least-investigated group of stocks &ndash; microcaps.
And it just so happens to be James Altucher and I&rsquo;s favorite part of the stock market.
One of them was up 75% just on Friday on a massive earnings beat. This company, despite being so small, was strategically positioned as a leader in Big Data &ndash; to the point where all the big AI firms were coming to them to get data for their large language models.
It&rsquo;s weird to think that a small stock could be a dominant player in its field, but it happens all the time.
Especially in times like now when people have been so focused on the BIGGEST stocks, like Nvidia, that they forgot there are 8,000 other stocks in the market (most of them in the microcap space).
That stock, by the way, has now more than doubled in the little more than 3 months since recommended it.
Two more are in within spitting distance of 100% gains. And our average position is up almost 30%, compared to the S&amp;P 500&rsquo;s milder 10% since we launched the service in July.
So, our readers are already sitting on some pretty respectable returns since we launched this service three months ago.
But this is still fairly early. I&rsquo;d say we&rsquo;re maybe in the third inning of the microcap bull market.
In the last microcap bull run, I scored a gain of 2,048% on my top stock. And it only took about eight months.
I don&rsquo;t say this to brag. I say it to offer proof to this notion that 1,000%+ gains in the next year really are possible.

ALC-Issue-11-11(1)

We Are So Back

The US government isn't new to stockpiling assets.
Since the 1930s, they've been hoarding everything from water to gold to, if you believe my neighbor Rick, little green men and their spaceships.
We've got strategic grain reserves (1930s), gold reserves (1934), petroleum reserves (1974), and even a strategic cheese reserve from 1933.
Yes, cheese.
So, heck, why not a Bitcoin reserve?
That&rsquo;s what Senator Cynthia Lummis proposed in her BITCOIN Act (Boosting Innovation Technology and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide).
The plan? Accumulate 1 million Bitcoin over five years, with a cap of 200,000 BTC per year.
Indeed, the US government already holds roughly 200,000 Bitcoin from various seizures.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/2Vu4WbVIfFE23Pre6D1uAi/3c8abde94e207ea959dbbe60a2b19b57/alc-issue-11-8-24-img-2.png" alt="" width="540px" />
But this would be different. This would be strategic, intentional accumulation with a 20-year minimum hold period.
So WHY would we do it? Let me lay out the case made by the advocates&hellip;
And then show you why a Trump-led &ldquo;quasi-reserve&rdquo; is far more likely. And what it means for you.
<h2 class="subhead nbp">The Case For a Bitcoin Reserve </h2>
The case is pretty simple.
The Federal debt has surpassed $35 trillion, with interest payments alone exceeding $1 trillion annually -- second only to Social Security payments.
Traditional solutions aren't cutting it.
Austerity? Political suicide. Tax increases? Even worse. Money printing? Eh&hellip; That's what got us here.
Game theory suggests that once one major nation establishes a significant Bitcoin reserve, others will follow.
El Salvador was first, but they're small potatoes. When a superpower like the US makes this move, it changes everything.
And the tension is increased by one simple fact: the supply dynamics are brutal for late-adopters.
So it pays to be early.
There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin, with an estimated 2-3 million already lost forever.
So let&rsquo;s say the US locks up 1 million in a strategic reserve -- that's roughly 5% of the total supply off the market. Forever.
If this were to happen, the market implications would be profound. Just MicroStrategy's relatively modest $20 million daily Bitcoin purchases are moving the needle.
Imagine systematic purchasing of 200,000 BTC annually by the US government.
Some analysts project this could establish a price floor around $173,000 per Bitcoin, potentially doubling after the next halving.
But WILL it happen? Yes, no, and kind of.
Realistically, Lummis' plan to buy 1 million Bitcoin faces massive hurdles and we&rsquo;re just not there yet.
In contrast, Trump will likely embrace a simpler approach: just not selling the seized Bitcoin.
This requires no new spending or legislation, making it a far more likely "easy win" for the administration's first moves in crypto policy.
However, one thing remains true:
The first major nation to embrace Bitcoin whole hog could rewrite the script entirely.
The clock is ticking. The pieces are moving.
The biggest risk now is getting left behind.
P.S.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/BU26U3q7ZY64xqCihReQh/fc86a45c6cc4e7eee9503cd00ce36e9c/alc-issue-11-8-24-img-3.png" alt="" width="540px" />

alc-issue-11-8-24-post-img

Federal Bitcoin: The No Sales Plan

Another day, another weird AI thing.
Recently, an AI artist (<a href="https://x.com/arikuschnir">@arikuschnir</a>) created this AI-generated &ldquo;<a href="https://x.com/DrewPavlou/status/1853582698365034911">micro-documentary</a>&rdquo; of Trump&rsquo;s ayahuasca journey.
And it&rsquo;s actually SCARY how hilarious it is.
A couple moments that stood out&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/5yk4bomXro3SumZ2VEZam6/f436d4c879fb2276c65253aebfff6ad4/ALC-Issue-11-07-24_2_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" /> <img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6BJqBfc8LQVV9bXuKocmEP/788acdff4c9f4f06ed7265131d25a976/ALC-Issue-11-07-24_3_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
While perhaps done for a laugh, the video does tap into a weird societal shift that&rsquo;s ensued over the past few years.
Let&rsquo;s take a step back.
And then we&rsquo;ll see why this could represent a major opportunity for investors plugged into this trend.
<h3>Things Turn Into Their Opposites </h3>
The 1960s saw the countercultural left embrace psychedelics as tools for enlightenment and rebellion against the establishment&hellip;
While the right moreso championed the pharmaceutical industry's ordered (but booming) progress.
Today, we're witnessing a strange inversion.
Largely led by figures like Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, and Peter Thiel, many on the right are becoming staunch psychedelic advocates.
This shift, while laced with its own brand of utopianism (as <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2024/11/psychedelics-maga-kennedy-trump/680479/?gift=vaU_BsG0tnmqKgTvTtvqWnmXe0YZHZNcKj2un49huzU">Shayla Love notes in The Atlantic</a>), represents a fundamental realignment.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/1XLRVOQaTxVgytCuOWDtF7/df4d5ccb701419333c72e9c2933afa83/ALC-Issue-11-07-24_4_.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
Conservative voices from Rick Perry to the National Review now champion opening the psychedelic industry.
And, ironically, they&rsquo;re viewing it through the lens of morality and social order -- the very establishment values the right once used to oppose it.
(In the &lsquo;60s, the focus was on preventing moral decay and social instability. Today, the focus is on defending personal choice and gaining social stability.)
Same as it always was.
On a long enough timeline, things tend to turn into their opposites.
But, for our purposes, it could be a goldmine.
Right now, right this second, may be the (relative) calm before the storm. The signs are everywhere.
<h3>Trump&rsquo;s Trippy Gold Rush </h3>
While nobody was watching, psychedelics have received massive mainstream acceptance from all corners of society.
First, books like Michael Pollan's "How to Change Your Mind" brought psychedelic therapy into the mainstream conversation.
Then, the FDA designated psilocybin therapy for severe depression as a <a href="https://www.axios.com/2023/07/19/mushrooms-cannabis-mental-health-treatment">&ldquo;breakthrough therapy&rdquo;</a>.
Many veterans have advocated for psychedelic therapies to treat PTSD and other mental health issues. (After a few trendsetters saw success.)
And then there&rsquo;s one industry&rsquo;s embrace that&rsquo;s having a HUGE influence on the American cultural embrace: sports.
Elite golfers are turning to <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/sport/golf/1968885/golf-mushroom-psychedelics-PGA-Tour">mushrooms and psychedelics to upgrade their swings</a>&hellip;
NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/19/sport/psilocybin-athletes-life-changing-injuries-psychedelics-spt-intl/index.html"> has been a vocal advocate for psychedelics</a>, particularly ayahuasca. (Rodgers claims it has improved his performance on the field and has called for the legalization of certain psychedelics.)
Mike Tyson has said he&rsquo;s been using psychedelic mushrooms during his training for the Jake Paul fight. Tyson described the experience: <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/boxing/2024/08/29/mike-tyson-psychedelics-mushrooms-athlete-training/74969058007/">&ldquo;It takes me to heaven, baby.&rdquo;</a>
UFC President Dana White has said the organization is <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/19/sport/psilocybin-athletes-life-changing-injuries-psychedelics-spt-intl/index.html">researching psychedelic drugs as a potential therapy for fighters' brain health</a>.
And finally, Trump has surrounded himself with outspoken supporters.
&gt; Musk is open about his use of prescribed ketamine, a quasi-psychedelic drug.
&gt; RFK Jr. -- who Trump said he would let &ldquo;go wild&rdquo; on health policy -- is definitely on board.&nbsp;
&gt; JD Vance is open to applications for PTSD.
In all, especially with the changing of the guard&hellip;
Psychedelics may also be on the verge of a gold rush. We&rsquo;re putting it on the radar.&nbsp;
Stay tuned for more as we heat-seek the opportunities.

Altucher Confidential News Feed

Filter By Date: